|
|
|
|
|
|
TAX
PREPARATION
SERVICES
-
Individuals
- 1040, 1040X, etc.
-
Partnerships
- 1065, 1065X
-
Corporate
- 1120, 1120s, 1120X
-
Not-for-profit 990,
990EZ
-
Fiduciary (Trusts and
Estates) 1041 etc.
-
Amended
tax returns
-
Employer
returns such as 940
-
Income tax planning
-
Delinquent
Taxes and Late Filings
IRS REPRESENTATION
SERVICES
-
Offers
in compromise
-
Audit
Representation
-
Tax Court
Representation
-
Assistance with
the removal of liens and lifting of
levies
-
Extensions,
Elections and all miscellaneous form
preparations and filings
Click below
to view the pre season Tax
Planning and preparation tips and to
find some useful planning
pointers
Click
here for information on the tax preparation
procedure
TAX
PLANNING
SERVICES
-
Personal
and corporate tax planning
-
Traders
and hedge Funds
-
Business and
entity structuring and formation
-
Trust and estate planning
-
Trust
entity formation facilitation
-
Tax accounting
-
Tax
strategy planning
-
Tax
strategy implementation
-
Asset
protection planning
-
Privately
Placed Life Insurance Strategies
-
Offshore
trust formations
-
Life
Insurance Trusts
-
Charitable
Remainder Trusts CRTS & CRUTS
-
Tax
audit representation
-
IRA
rollovers
-
Income
Tax Withholding estimates and other tax
estimates
For
more specific information click on a topic
below:
|
|
Cost efficient and carefully considered solutions which
you can implement are key
elements to business support and
consulting services.
For
more specific information click on a topic
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a San Diego accounting firm that
focuses on you, the client.
The firm specialty
areas are
Private Wealth
Management
and Income Tax, Auditing and Business
Assurance services. Outlines of services
can be found by scrolling on the left
hand side, detailed information can be
found on service specific pages from the
menu's above.
The
income tax
practice area focus of the firm is on
tax preparation, tax planning, tax court
representation, IRS representation,
offers in compromise, filing of back
taxes and the implementation of various
tax saving strategies.
The full range of
tax preparation and planning services
are offered for
hedge funds
and day traders. Schedule D's are
completed through a direct broker
interface and can also be done for other
CPA firms and tax practitioners on a
cost efficient basis. Contact us if you
need assistance with trader tax status,
mark to market elections or the setting
up of entities and compliance audits.
Whether you trade stocks or commodities
there are excellent tax saving
strategies and an idea called tax loss
insurance that you should find out
about.
If you are being
audited by the IRS or has the IRS levied
your wages or filed a lien then contact
us today, we can help. Don't ignore it,
it does not go away. Contact this firm
today, we will begin to deal with it
immediately.
The
audit
practice area of the firm covers the
full spectrum of audit and attest
services. Please call to discuss.
A full range of
business support
services
is provided by this firm to tax clients
and includes bookkeeping, QuickBooks,
state and federal filings and payroll.
Turnaround time for bookkeeping is about
four to five days, preparation on a
monthly basis and includes tax
estimates.
FIRM
CLIENTS
Clients of this
firm include tax attorneys, CEO's,
insurance companies, construction
companies, the auto industry, academia,
musicians, not-for-profit organizations,
real estate investors, jewelers,
designers, veterinarians, stock market
traders and
day traders,
analysts & hedge funds,
military personnel, retirees and
students to name a few. Client tax
liabilities cover the spectrum ranging
from millions of dollars to receiving
earned income credits from the IRS.
As John Maynard Keynes
put it
" The avoidance of taxes is the only intellectual
pursuit that still carries any reward."
Proactive tax planning is a necessary
first step to reducing taxes, you spend
up to 45% of your annual income on
income taxes, shouldn't you be taking it
seriously? Every taxpayer should pay
their share of income taxes but not more
due to poor planning or not deducting
allowable deductions.
I am pleased to
offer you a free initial consultation.
Just call or email for an appointment.
Of course, there is no obligation if you
decide not to engage the services of my
firm. Call today 858-752-1726 to
schedule a consultation or
contact
electronically.
The preparation of a tax return is in
many cases a simple matter of entering
data into a computer program. Proper tax
preparation is truly an intellectual
pursuit and that is where the
professionals such as certified public
accountants distinguish themselves.
CPA's look at preparation holistically,
they view planning as a necessary first
step in the tax preparation process.
IRS
TROUBLE?
Are
you in trouble with the IRS? Are you
being audited by the IRS or having your
wages levied by the IRS or have a lien
filed by the IRS. Did you know that you
may be able to settle outstanding tax
debts for pennies in the dollar? Have
you not filed for many years? Did you
forget to take a deduction a few years
ago? Call today, there may very well be
an easy solution to your problem, let us
deal with the IRS on your behalf and
stop worrying about it. +
SPECIALIZED
TAX SERVICES
For the high net
worth individual, the accredited or
super accredited investor,
we offer a unique program approach to
tax, estate tax and asset protection
planning and preparation.
Programs last for approximately 5 days
with a focus on
wealth preservation.
Does your
estate tax planning strategy
effectively remove your assets from your
estate? Are you optimally utilizing
privately placed life insurance
and gifting strategies? If not give me a
call today.
Below under
current topics you will find
areas of interest and frequently
encountered questions and
requests for information. Also
covered are relevant news topics
as they pertain to the firm
client base. Please also find
below the San Diego, La Jolla
contact
details
and other information about the
firm under "About Us".
If
you have any questions feel free to call
at (858) 752 1726 .
|
|
|
|
|
|

 
|
|
|
Below are the most current and
frequent inquiries being
received. To better serve you,
summary outlines on the topics
are provided. Please click on
the link to view current
information about the topic.
These topics are updated on a
continuous basis. Should you
require further information or
assistance please do not
hesitate to call - (858)
752.1726
BEWARE!
IRS Warns of E-Mail Scam That
Uses 'Refund' as Bait The IRS
may be holding a tax refund
for you, but if you're getting
e-mails about it, they're not
from the IRS. It's a scam.
Questions pertaining to taxes
Review
Your Tax Position after completion of your
return
Set Up
Your IRA
IRS Releases Audit Guide To
Field Agents For Veterinary
Practices
|
|
|
|
|

Telephone 858.752.1726
California, La Jolla, Rancho Bernardo, Rancho Santa
Fe, Del Mar, Escondido,
Coronado, Mission Valley, Point Loma, Carlsbad, La
Jolla, San Diego, A California CPA Firm
CPA accounting firm for all San Diego
La Jolla tax
preparation, amended tax returns, 1040, 1120, 720,
990, CPA tax advisor, estate planning, PPVUL,
PPLI, asset protection, privately placed life
insurance, Quickbooks, auditing,
reviews, compilations, corporation formation, LLC formation, company setup and accounting services.
|
|
|
About Us
:
Tax
:
Audit
:
Business
:
Contacts
: Legal Disclaimer : Sitemap
|
|
|
Links
|
|
Copyright Dion Gouws CPA San Diego
Dion Gouws San Diego CPA firm licensed in the State of
California. The firms Services are
categorized under Business Support Services which include areas such as
bookkeeping including QuickBooks accounting and management consulting;
Auditing which covers all areas of attestation and review services and; Income Tax
Services which include tax planning, preparation, tax court representation and
consulting. Please review the summaries on the upper left, they will in turn guide
you to the relevant specialty areas. CPA tax
practitioners and firms are regulated by
the Department of the
Treasury's Circular 230
which sets high practice
standards that don't apply
to most tax return preparers,
including commercial
preparers. For text see
IRS Circular 230.
California, La Jolla, San Diego.
|
|
IN THE NEWS
THE FOLLOWING ARE NEWS ARTICLES WHICH ARE REFERENCED
THROUGHOUT THE WEBSITE. YOU WILL
BE AUTOMATICALLY REFERRED TO THE APPROPRIATE ARTICLE FROM
WITHIN THE SITE.
Taxpayers Have Until April 17 to File and Pay
|
| |
| IR-2007-15, Jan. 24, 2007 WASHINGTON — Taxpayers
across the nation will have until Tuesday, April 17,
2007, to file their 2006 returns and pay any taxes
due, the Internal Revenue Service announced today.
Taxpayers will have extra time to file and pay
because April 15 falls on a Sunday in 2007, and the
following day, Monday, April 16, is Emancipation Day,
a legal holiday in the District of Columbia.
“This year, taxpayers have additional time to file
and pay beyond the traditional April 15 deadline,”
said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. “As we always
do, we encourage taxpayers to get an early start on
their taxes to make sure they have plenty of time to
accurately prepare their return.”
This means the entire country has an April 17
deadline. Previously, the April 17 deadline applied
just to individuals in the District of Columbia and
six eastern states who are served by an IRS processing
facility in Massachusetts, where Patriots Day will be
observed on April 16.
The April 17, 2007 deadline will apply to any of
the following:
-
2006 federal individual income tax returns,
whether filed electronically or on paper.
-
Requests for an automatic six-month tax-filing
extension, whether submitted electronically or on
Form 4868.
-
Tax year 2006 balance due payments, whether made
electronically (direct debit or credit card) or by
check.
-
Tax-year 2006 contributions to a Roth or
traditional IRA.
-
Individual estimated tax payments for the first
quarter of 2007, whether made electronically or by
check.
-
Individual refund claims for tax year 2003, where
the regular three-year statute of limitations is
expiring.
Other tax-filing and payment requirements affected
by this change are described in IRS Publication 509,
Tax Calendars for 2007, available on this Web site.
Most taxpayers will not have to change their plans
in response to this announcement. Three out of four
individual filers get refunds. Typically, returns
claiming refunds are filed early in the tax season.
By law, filing and payment deadlines that fall on a
Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday are timely satisfied
if met on the next business day. Under a federal
statute enacted decades ago, holidays observed in the
District of Columbia have impact nationwide on tax
issues, not just in D.C. Under recently-enacted city
legislation, April 16 is a holiday in the District of
Columbia. Officials recently became aware of the
intersection of the national filing day and the local
observance of the new Emancipation Day holiday after
most forms and publications for the current tax filing
season went to print.
Even with the extra time, taxpayers can skip the
last-minute rush and avoid needless mistakes by filing
early, taking advantage of the speed and convenience
of electronic filing, choosing direct deposit for any
refunds and paying any taxes due by direct debit or
credit card. IRS.gov has further details on electronic
filing and payment options and links to companies
providing these services. |
|
|
|
| |
| IR-2006-154, Sept. 29, 2006
WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue
Service acknowledged the
certification by Toyota Motor Sales
U.S.A., Inc., that several of their
hybrid Model Year 2007 vehicles
qualify for the hybrid tax credit
enacted by the Energy Policy Act of
2005.
The certified vehicles are the
Toyota Prius, Toyota Highlander
Hybrid and the Lexus RX 400h 2WD and
4WD vehicles. The tax credit for
hybrid vehicles applies to vehicles
purchased on or after January 1,
2006, and may be as much as $3,400
for those who purchase the most
fuel-efficient vehicles.
The hybrid vehicle certifications
recently acknowledged by the IRS and
their full credit amounts are:
-
2007 Toyota Prius $3,150
-
2007 Toyota Highlander Hybrid
2WD and 4WD $2,600
-
2007 Lexus RX 400h 2WD and 4WD
$2,200
The full credit amount for these
Toyota and Lexus vehicles is
available to qualifying purchasers
through September 30, 2006.
This tax credit replaced the tax
deduction of $2,000, which was
previously allowed for taxpayers who
purchased a new hybrid vehicle
before December 31, 2005, for the
clean-burning fuel deduction. Many
currently available hybrid vehicles
have been certified and qualify for
the credit.
The credit for otherwise
qualifying vehicles begins to phase
out in the second calendar quarter
after the quarter in which the
manufacturer sells its 60,000th
qualifying vehicle. Toyota has
reported sales of 88,610 qualifying
vehicles (41,779 in the quarter
ended March 31, 2006 and 44,831 in
the quarter ended June 30, 2006).
The phase out period for Toyota
vehicles will begin on October 1,
2006.
Therefore the applicable credit
amounts during the phase out period
for the 2007 model-year vehicles are
as follows:
|
Qualifying
Vehicle |
Purchased by
9/30/06 |
Purchased from
10/1/06 through 3/31/07 |
Purchased from
4/1/07 through 9/30/07 |
Purchased
After 10/1/07 |
|
Toyota Prius |
$3,150 |
$1,575 |
$787.50 |
No Credit |
|
Toyota
Highlander 2WD and 4WD |
$2,600
|
$1,300
|
$650
|
No Credit
|
|
Lexus RX 400h
2WD and 4WD |
$2,200 |
$1,100 |
$550 |
No Credit |
|
|
|
| |
| IR-2006-162, October 18, 2006
Washington — The Internal Revenue Service
today announced cost of living adjustments
applicable to dollar limitations for pension
plans and other items for Tax Year 2007.
Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code
provides for dollar limitations on benefits
and contributions under qualified retirement
plans. It also requires that the
Commissioner annually adjust these limits
for cost of living increases.
Many of the pension plan limitations will
change for 2007. For most of the
limitations, the increase in the
cost-of-living index met the statutory
thresholds that trigger their adjustment.
For example, the limitation under Section
402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective
deferrals described in Section 402(g)(3) is
increased from $15,000 to $15,500.
This limitation affects elective deferrals
to Section 401(k) plans and to the Federal
Government’s Thrift Savings Plan, among
other plans.
Effective January 1, 2007, the limitation
on the annual benefit under a defined
benefit plan under Section 415(b)(1)(A) is
increased from $175,000 to $180,000.
For participants who separated from service
before January 1, 2007, the limitation for
defined benefit plans under Section
415(b)(1)(B) is computed by multiplying the
participant's compensation limitation, as
adjusted through 2006, by 1.0334.
The limitation for defined contribution
plans under Section 415(c)(1)(A) is
increased from $44,000 to $45,000.
The Code provides that various other
dollar amounts are to be adjusted at the
same time and in the same manner as the
dollar limitation of Section 415(b)(1)(A).
These dollar amounts and the adjusted
amounts are as follows:
The limitation under Section 402(g)(1) on
the exclusion for elective deferrals
described in Section 402(g)(3) is increased
from $15,000 to $15,500.
The annual compensation limit under
Sections 401(a)(17), 404(l), 408(k)(3)(C),
and 408(k)(6)(D)(ii) is increased from
$220,000 to $225,000.
The dollar limitation under Section
416(i)(1)(A)(i) concerning the definition of
key employee in a top-heavy plan is
increased from $140,000 to $145,000.
The dollar amount under Section
409(o)(1)(C)(ii) for determining the maximum
account balance in an employee stock
ownership plan subject to a 5 year
distribution period is increased from
$885,000 to $915,000, while the dollar
amount used to determine the lengthening of
the 5 year distribution period is increased
from $175,000 to $180,000.
The limitation used in the definition of
highly compensated employee under Section
414(q)(1)(B) remains unchanged at $100,000.
The dollar limitation under Section
414(v)(2)(B)(i) for catch-up contributions
to an applicable employer plan other than a
plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or
Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or
over remains unchanged at $5,000. The
dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii)
for catch-up contributions to an applicable
employer plan described in Section
401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals
aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $2,500.
The annual compensation limitation under
Section 401(a)(17) for eligible participants
in certain governmental plans that, under
the plan as in effect on July 1, 1993,
allowed cost of living adjustments to the
compensation limitation under the plan under
Section 401(a)(17) to be taken into account,
is increased from $325,000 to $335,000.
The compensation amount under Section
408(k)(2)(C) regarding simplified employee
pensions (SEPs) is increased from $450 to
$500.
The limitation on deferrals under Section
457(e)(15) concerning deferred compensation
plans of state and local governments and
tax-exempt organizations is increased from
$15,000 to $15,500.
The compensation amounts under Section
1.61 21(f)(5)(i) of the Income Tax
Regulations concerning the definition of
“control employee” for fringe benefit
valuation purposes is increased from $85,000
to $90,000. The compensation amount
under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) is
increased from $175,000 to $180,000.
The limitation under Section 408(p)(2)(E)
regarding SIMPLE retirement accounts is
increased from $10,000 to $10,500.
Administrators of defined benefit or
defined contribution plans that have
received favorable determination letters
should not request new determination letters
solely because of yearly amendments to
adjust maximum limitations in the plans. |
|
|
| |
| IR-2006-152, Sept. 28, 2006 WASHINGTON —
Military reservists called to active duty can
receive payments from their individual
retirement accounts, 401(k) plans and 403(b)
tax-sheltered annuities, without having to pay
the early-distribution tax, according to the
Internal Revenue Service.
The newly-enacted Pension Protection Act of
2006 eliminates the 10-percent
early-distribution tax that normally applies to
most retirement distributions received before
age 59½. The new law provides this relief to
reservists called to active duty for at least
180 days or for an indefinite period.
Eligible reservists activated after Sept. 11,
2001, and before Dec. 31, 2007, qualify for
relief from this tax. This tax is often referred
to as the 10-percent early-withdrawal penalty.
Regular income taxes continue to apply to these
payments in most cases.
Early distributions from both Roth and
traditional IRAs received by a reservist while
on active duty qualify for this relief.
Likewise, a reservist’s elective contributions
and earnings distributed to him or her by
employer sponsored 401(k) plans and 403(b)
tax-sheltered annuities also qualify for this
relief.
Because this relief is retroactive, eligible
reservists who already paid the 10-percent tax
can claim a refund by using Form 1040X to amend
their return for the year in which the
retirement distribution was received. Eligible
reservists should write the words, "active duty
reservist," at the top of the form. In Part II
Explanation of Changes, the reservist should
write the date he or she was called to active
duty, the amount of the retirement distribution
and the amount of early-distribution tax paid.
Reservists can choose to re-contribute part
or all of these distributions to an IRA.
Ordinarily, these special contributions must be
made within two years after the reservist's
active-duty period ends. However, if the
reservist's active duty ended before Aug. 17,
2006 (the date the new law was enacted), he or
she will have until Aug. 17, 2008, to make these
special contributions. No deduction is available
for these contributions. |
|
|
I.R.S. Enlists Outside Help in Collecting Delinquent Taxes
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON (NYT);
National Desk
August 20, 2006, Sunday
If
you owe back taxes to the federal government, the next call
asking you to pay may come not from an Internal Revenue
Service officer, but from a private debt collector.
Within two weeks, the I.R.S. will turn over
data on 12,500 taxpayers -- each of whom
owes $25,000 or less in back taxes -- to
three collection agencies. Larger debtors
will continue to be pursued by I.R.S.
officers. Back to tax
The move, an initiative of the Bush
administration, represents the first step in
a broader plan to outsource the collection
of smaller tax debts to private companies
over time. Although I.R.S. officials
acknowledge that this will be much more
expensive than doing it internally, they say
that Congress has forced their hand by
refusing to let them hire more revenue
officers, who could pull in a lot of
easy-to-collect money.
The private debt collection program is
expected to bring in $1.4 billion over 10
years, with the collection agencies keeping
about $330 million of that, or 22 to 24
cents on the dollar.
Back to tax
By hiring more revenue officers, the I.R.S.
could collect more than $9 billion each year
and spend only $296 million -- or about
three cents on the dollar -- to do so,
Charles O. Rossotti, the computer systems
entrepreneur who was commissioner from 1997
to 2002, told Congress four years ago.
I.R.S. officials on Friday characterized
those figures as correct, but said that the
plan Mr. Rossotti had proposed had been
forestalled by Congress, which declined to
authorize it to hire more revenue officers.
Back to tax
Critics of the privatization plan point not
only to the higher cost but also to what
they say is a greater potential for abuse.
With private companies in the mix, they say,
debtors could more easily be tricked into
paying money to scam artists using spoof Web
sites or other schemes, a problem the I.R.S.
alerted taxpayers to in April. Brady R.
Bennett, collections director for the I.R.S.,
said that by 2008, about 350,000 past-due
tax records will be distributed among about
10 private debt-collection agencies. To
guard against fraud, he said, the agencies
will contact taxpayers only by telephone or
mail -- not the Internet -- and will
instruct them to send all payments directly
to the United States Treasury, not the
private collection agency.
Back to tax
One of the three companies selected by the
I.R.S. is a law firm in Austin, Tex., where
a former partner, Juan Pena, admitted in
2002 that he paid bribes to win a collection
contract from the city of San Antonio. He
went to jail for the crime.
Last month the same law firm, Linebarger
Goggan Blair & Sampson firms, was again in
the news. One of its competitors, Municipal
Services Bureau, also of Austin, sued
Brownsville, Tex., charging that the city
improperly gave the Linebarger firm a
collections contract that it suggested was
influenced by campaign contributions to two
city commissioners.
Back to tax
Joe Householder, a spokesman for Linebarger
firm, which specializes in delinquent tax
collections, said it had resolved the issues
raised by the Pena case in 2002 and that it
believed it had acted properly in
Brownsville. The mayor of Brownsville, Eddie
Trevino Jr., said that the contract vote had
been unanimous and scoffed at the
accusations of misconduct.
The two other companies that have won debt
collection contracts from the I.R.S. are
Pioneer Credit Recovery of Arcade, N.Y., a
division of the SLM Corporation, and the CBE
Group of Waterloo, Iowa.
Back to tax
The main objection so far to the
privatization program is that it is more
expensive than internal collection. ''I
freely admit it,'' Mark W. Everson, the tax
commissioner, told a House of
Representatives committee in March.
Privatizing government services is often
promoted as a way to cut costs. But the
government would probably net $1.1 billion
from private debt collectors over 10 years,
compared with the $87 billion that could be
reaped if the agency hired more revenue
officers, as Mr. Rossotti had recommended.
Back to tax
Taxpayer rights are at risk with
privatization, Nina B. Olson, the I.R.S.
taxpayer advocate, warned Congress earlier
this year. ''Because private collectors will
operate under rules of profit maximization
rather than the I.R.S.'s customer-service
based policy,'' she warned, the private
collectors may have less incentive to
safeguard taxpayer rights.
Al Cleland, a retired I.R.S. tax collector
in Minnesota, predicted that using private
collectors would cause some debtors to owe
more. Back to tax
''We always told people to get current on
their taxes first, so they would not have
more penalties added, and then work on
paying off their back taxes,'' Mr. Cleland
said. ''A private collection agency has no
incentive to tell taxpayers that, so people
will pay more penalties.''
Mr. Bennett of the I.R.S. said that such
advice was correct, but that it applied
primarily to small business firm owners,
whose cases will not be sent to the private
agencies.
Under federal budget rules, money spent to
hire tax collectors is treated as a
discretionary expense, and Congress is
cutting discretionary spending. In business
terms, the rules treat the I.R.S. as a cost
center, not as the government's profit
center. Back to tax
The private debt-collection firms program,
however, is outside the budget rules
because, except for the start-up costs, the
collectors are to be paid from the proceeds.
August 20, 2006, Sunday New York Times
Late Edition - Final
Back to tax
IRS to Cut Audits on Wealthiest
July 24, 2006 (United Press International) —
The Bush administration plans to cut nearly
in half the number of auditors who review
tax returns of some of the wealthiest U.S.
taxpayers and Firms.
Plans call for eliminating 157 of the
Internal Revenue Service's 345 estate tax
lawyers, The New York Times reported. The
cuts will affect audits of taxpayers who are
subject to gift and estate taxes when they
transfer assets to their children and
others, the newspaper said.
Back to tax
IRS Deputy Commissioner Kevin Brown told the
Times he ordered the staff cuts because the
number of Americans who are subject to the
estate tax has fallen under the Bush
administration.Back
to tax
However, six IRS estate tax lawyers whose
jobs are at risk told the newspaper the cuts
are part of a behind-the-scenes move at the
IRS to shield people with political
connections and complex tax-avoidance
devices from thorough audits.Back
to tax
IRS estate tax lawyer Sharyn Phillips said
the cuts were a "back-door way for the Bush
administration to achieve what it cannot get
from Congress, which is repeal of the estate
tax."Back
to tax
Brown said the savings from estate tax
lawyer job cuts would be used to hire agents
to audit income tax returns, especially
those from people making over $1 million.Back
to tax
© Copyright 2006 by United Press
International
|
IRS limits tax break for HRA transfers
|
|
Business Insurance via
NewsEdge Corporation :
WASHINGTON-Employees
with health reimbursement arrangements will lose HRA tax
breaks if their employers allow enrollees to transfer
unused balances to anyone other than a spouse or
dependent, the Internal Revenue Service says.
Back to tax
If employers give
employees the ability to designate that anyone can
receive and use their HRA account balances to pay for
medical expenses, the HRA will lose its tax-favored
status and all HRA participants will be taxed on funds
they receive from the HRA to reimburse them for medical
expenses, the IRS said.
``Amounts paid to an
employee under a reimbursement plan are not excludable
from gross income...if the plan permits amounts to be
paid as...medical benefits to a designated beneficiary
other than the employee's spouse or dependents of the
employee,'' the IRS said in Revenue Ruling 2006-36,
which was released last week.
``Because the benefit
is provided in connection with the performance of
services by the employee, the benefit is considered
provided to the employee and must be included in the
employee's gross income,'' the ruling states.
Benefit experts aren't
surprised at the IRS ruling, noting that it draws upon
rules the IRS laid down three years ago, in which the
IRS explicitly recognized the legitimacy of HRAs as a
health care reimbursement vehicle.Back
to tax
``The ruling confirms
that the IRS meant what they said in 2002: HRA funds can
only flow to employees, spouses and dependents,'' said
Andy Anderson, of counsel to the law firm Morgan, Lewis
& Bockius L.L.P. in Chicago.
While HRAs haven't
received the level of publicity of a somewhat similar
arrangement-health savings accounts-they are, in fact,
much more common among large employers. For example,
among employers with at least 20,000 employees that
offered a consumer-driven health care plan in 2005, 89%
provided an HRA, while only 11% provided an HSA,
according to a survey by Mercer Health & Benefits.Back
to tax
Like HSAs, HRAs are
linked to high-deductible health insurance plans, with
the arrangements used to reimburse enrollees for a
portion of uncovered health care expenses, such as those
that fall under the deductible.
Also like an HSA,
unused HRA balances are automatically rolled over to pay
for expenses incurred in succeeding years.
But there are important
differences including:
* Employers can require
that HRA balances be used only for reimbursement of
medical expenses. By contrast, employees can use HSA
balances for any reason, though they are taxed on the
distribution if used to cover nonhealth care expenses.
* Only employers can
fund HRAs. Federal law allows both employers and
employees to fund HSAs.Back
to tax
* Federal law lays down
specific rules on how much money can be contributed each
year to employee HSAs, as well as the design of the
high-deductible health insurance plans that are linked
to HSAs. No such restrictions are imposed on HRAs.
* Unless set up to pay
for health care expenses after retirement, employees
typically forfeit HRA balances when they terminate
employment. By contrast, HSA balances belong to the
employee.
In the ruling, the IRS
described an arrangement in which the HRA is used to
reimburse the medical care expenses of employees and
retirees, their spouses and dependents. Additionally,
the HRA reimburses the medical care expenses of a
surviving spouse and dependents of a deceased employee.Back
to tax
Upon the death of the
deceased employee's surviving spouse and last dependent,
or upon the death of the employee if there is no
surviving spouse or dependent, an unused HRA account
balance could be used to pay for any medical beneficiary
designated by the employee. It's that last feature that
causes the arrangement to lose its tax-favored status,
according to the IRS ruling.
Benefit experts don't
know how widespread such arrangements might be, though
typically the IRS issues such rulings when it becomes
aware of such a practice and wants to stop it.
``The IRS must have
learned of the arrangement and wants to end it before it
becomes widespread,'' said Sharon Cohen, an attorney
with Watson Wyatt Worldwide in Arlington, Va.
Such arrangements would
appeal, for example, to single employees who would want
to give account balances to a close relative, such as a
nephew or niece that faced significant medical care
expenses.Back
to tax
<<Business Insurance --
08/28/06>>
IRS reports audits up 21 percent Tax agency also
cites highest number of audits in 10 years of
those making $100,000 or more.
March 17, 2006: 5:52 PM EST Firms
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - Just over 1.2 million
individual income tax returns were audited in
fiscal year 2005, according to a report released
late Friday afternoon by the Internal Revenue
Service.
That represents a 21 percent increase from a
year earlier. That follows a 19 percent increase
in audits in 2004.
The IRS also noted that the number of audits of
high-income taxpayers -- defined as those with
income of $100,000 or more -- reached 219,208, the
highest figure in 10 years.
A table detailing individual return audits
showed that the income groups with the highest
percentage of audits were taxpayers who reported
income under $25,000 and taxpayers who reported
income between $100,000 and $200,000.
Approximately 1.5 percent of returns reporting
income under $25,000 were audited; while 1.41
percent of returns reporting income between
$100,000 and $200,000 were audited.
The IRS was not available to comment on the
report.
|
An
IRS Audit
This
Life Advice® section about An IRS Audit
was produced by the MetLife Consumer Education Center with
assistance from the Internal Revenue Service. Firms
What Is an
Audit?
Why Me?
Which Deductions Are Likely to Be Challenged
What Now?
Do I
Need Professional Help?
Can I
Appeal the Findings?
Audit Advice
For More
Information
Fear of being audited by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) can leave even an honest
taxpayer unnerved. It's important to be truthful when
filing your taxes, of course, but it's even more critical
to be prepared to substantiate your return with complete
records if and when the IRS comes knocking.
What Is an Audit?
An IRS audit is generally an
impartial review of your tax return to determine its
accuracy. It is not an accusation of wrongdoing. But it is
important to know that you, the taxpayer, have the burden
of proving that your return is accurate. The IRS does not
have to disprove anything. For example, if you gave $100
worth of old clothing to a charity but did not receive a
receipt or have other proof that such a gift was made, you
could be in trouble if you're audited. If the IRS
questions the deduction and you cannot provide proper
evidence that a gift, in such amount, was made, the
deduction may be disallowed.
Why Me?
There are three categories of
people most likely to be audited: people in cash
businesses, certain professionals and people taking
unusually large deductions.
- Cash businesses are
easy targets for the IRS. Many people in these
businesses don't declare all their income, and the IRS
knows it. If, for example, your occupation is listed as
a hairdresser, waiter or bartender, it may raise a red
flag. If you regularly receive cash for your work, be
sure to report all the money you earn, including tips.
- Professionals such
as doctors, lawyers and accountants are also targeted.
That's because they generally run their own businesses
and do their own bookkeeping.
- Large, unusual
deductions are easily picked up by IRS computers.
Although these deductions may be justified,
they may still raise a red flag.
Which Deductions Are
Likely to Be Challenged?
The IRS mandates that certain
deductions must exceed a minimum percentage of your income
before you can claim them. For example, medical deductions
must exceed 7.5% of your income, and casualty loss
deductions must exceed 10% before you can claim them. Only
a small number of taxpayers qualify, so if you claim these
deductions, keep careful records.
The IRS is also likely to look
at your contributions to charity. If you deduct more than
the IRS's statistical norms, you may be audited. You must
have a receipt (not just a canceled check) for any single
donation of $250 or more. If you do not have a receipt,
the IRS may disallow the deduction. A home office
deduction may also be questioned. If you deduct expenses
related to a home office, that office must be used solely
for business-related activities. You must also perform the
majority of your business in that office. A doctor who
uses a room at home to do bookkeeping would not qualify
for a deduction because it is not his or her main place of
business.
The IRS may also audit if they
receive a tip that you are cheating on your tax returns.
What Now?
If you are notified that you
will be audited, take it seriously but don't panic. First,
read the letter from the IRS carefully and figure out what
you are being asked to do. It may be as simple as signing
your return. There are three basic types of audits, and
the letter will explain which one applies to you:
- A Correspondence
Audit is for minor mistakes. A letter from the
IRS will tell you what documentation to send them
through the mail. Once the IRS is satisfied that it has
the correct paperwork, the matter will be closed.
- A Field Audit
is one in which the auditor comes to your
business or home to verify the accuracy of your return.
This type of audit is usually done if the return is
complicated and involves business operations. If your
records are neat and in order, it will suggest to the
auditor that you are a conscientious business person.
- An Office Audit
requires that you physically appear on a specific date
and time at an IRS facility and bring your
documentation. Bring only the documents asked for.
Otherwise, you will leave yourself open to an
examination of all your records, even if they are not in
dispute. If you are unable to keep a scheduled audit
appointment, phone and reschedule as soon as possible.
Do I Need Professional
Help?
Probably. Taxation is very
complicated and technical, and you will benefit from
having an expert on your side. If you had an attorney or
CPA prepare your return, you may want to bring that person
to the audit. Professional tax preparation services will
sometimes send someone to accompany you to an audit. Weigh
the amount of tax in question against the cost of bringing
a professional firm with you.
Can I Appeal the Findings?
You can either agree or
disagree with the auditor's findings. If you agree, your
experience with the IRS is finished upon completion of
some paperwork and payment of any outstanding amounts. If
you disagree with the auditor, the issues in question can
be reviewed informally with the auditor's supervisor or
you can appeal to the IRS appeals office, which is
independent of the local IRS office that conducted the
audit. If you do not reach an agreement with the appeals
officer, you may take your case to the U.S. Tax Court,
U.S. Claims Court or U.S. District Court. The Tax Court
generally hears cases before any tax is assessed or paid.
The Claims Court and District Court generally hear tax
cases only after you have paid the tax and filed a claim
for refund.
If you cannot decide to agree
or disagree, the IRS has formal procedures to help you
make up your mind. Within a few weeks of your audit, you
will receive a letter that gives you 30 days to either
agree with the auditor or file a formal appeal. The letter
will explain the steps to take, depending on your choice
of action. If you do not respond to the 30-day letter, or
if you do not reach an agreement with the appeals officer,
the IRS will send you a "statutory notice of deficiency,"
giving you 90 days to bring your case to the Tax Court. If
you take no action, you lose your right to go to Tax
Court, and the IRS will assess the additional tax against
you.
Audit Advice
- Don't rush.
Respond promptly to a notification of audit, but don't
hesitate to ask for a postponement if you need time to
gather records.
- Don't lie.
Answer questions truthfully, but don't volunteer
information that isn't asked for.
- Be friendly.
A positive attitude will go a long way.
- Keep good records.
The burden of proof is on you.
- Keep records for
seven years.
- Educate yourself.
Read
IRS Publication 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer. You
can order this and other tax forms and publications by
calling the IRS at 1-800-829-1040.
- Ask for help.
Call or visit the IRS for help in preparation of your
tax return. Refer to your 1040 instruction booklet for a
directory of telephone numbers for recorded information
or "live" help.
- Don't let the
auditor keep your original documents.
- Appeal the audit if
you disagree with the findings.
- Come clean.
If you know one of your deductions is unsupportable,
admit it and pay the tax.
If you have prepared your tax
return truthfully and have saved receipts to back up your
deductions, notice of an IRS audit should not make you
unduly nervous. IRS employees, after all, are only doing
the job we pay them to do.
IRS audits fewer
businesses, more people
Researchers
say the numbers show a flaw in the war on
corporate scofflaws. The IRS says that
ignores the reasons.
By Associated
Press
Published April 12, 2004 Firms
WASHINGTON - The Internal Revenue Service
audited fewer corporations, small businesses
and partnerships last year but more individual
taxpayers, according to a study of government
data.
Syracuse University's Transactional Records
Access Clearinghouse, in its analysis of IRS
data made available Sunday, concluded that the
audit rate for businesses of all sizes slid
slightly last year to 2.1 audits for every
1,000 businesses, from 2.2 audits per 1,000
businesses the previous year.
At the same time, the IRS audited 14
percent more individual tax returns. The audit
rate for individuals increased last year to
6.5 audits for every 1,000 taxpayers.
Official audit rates released by the IRS
last month show a similar trend.
Researchers said the declining audits of
businesses exposes a flaw in the
administration's tough stance against
corporate wrongdoing.
"These and a number of other measures -
documented by the agency's own data - indicate
that the actual performance of the IRS differs
in significant ways from some of the Bush
administration claims when it comes to
cracking down on corporate scofflaws," the
report said.
Researchers point specifically to declining
audits of the largest corporations and a type
of business organization that passes income
and taxes on to its shareholders or partners -
an arrangement found to have been improperly
used in some corporate accounting scandals.
IRS commissioner Mark Everson said in an
interview that the agency's broad attack on
corporate tax evasion does not show up in the
audit numbers.
"Am I satisfied with the numbers? No. I
want to see them go up," he said. "I'm not
surprised that that's lagging the other
indicators. And while I think it's an
important indicator, it doesn't tell the whole
story."
Some advocates said the trend appears
troubling.
"What struck me first was the commissioner
earlier this week said that they'd increased
enforcement and then I look at these numbers
and say, "What is he talking about?"' said
David Keating, senior counselor for the
National Taxpayers Union. "It really opens up
a credibility gap."
In a detailed written response, the IRS
said the study ignores the reasons for the
decline in corporate audits and other
enforcement actions taken against businesses.
The IRS said the decline can be attributed
partly to the explosive growth in tax
shelters, which make audits more intricate and
time-consuming. Tax collectors worked more
than 2,200 corporate tax shelter returns in
2003. Each takes an average 71/2 months longer
than other corporate returns, and their number
is growing.
The agency's work force has shrunk while
its workload has grown, the IRS said.
The agency has been criticized for shifting
money from tax enforcement to pay for other
administrative costs. Everson said he has
reversed that practice and expects the agency
will have hired 250 more agents by autumn. If
the agency gets the budget requested by the
president, it will hire an additional 600
agents by the same time next year, he said.
Audits and other enforcement activities
declined sharply in the late 1990s when
Congress mandated that tax collectors pay more
attention to customer service.
The Syracuse University study concludes
that audits of individuals increased last
year. Much of the increase occurred in
correspondence audits, not face-to-face
meetings between revenue agents and taxpayers.
Researchers said the audits "by their very
nature are comparatively superficial."
The IRS said correspondence audits are
faster and cheaper than traditional audits.
The average additional tax assessed in a
correspondence audit was $3,338 last year.
[Last modified April 12,
2004, 01:05:27] Firms
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The IRS announced
Thursday that the number of tax-return audits in
2005 increased by over 20 percent, to 1.22
million, the highest number in seven years.
In addition, increased audits led to a 10
percent growth in "enforcement revenues," to $47.3
billion.
IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson said the
better enforcement stemmed from increased efforts
to train employees to comply with the 1998 IRS
reform act.
"Part of the increases comes from improved
procedures and part from a new emphasis on
enforcement," he said.
Audits of high-income individuals -- with
salaries more than $100,000 -- reached their
highest level in 10 years, at 221,000.
Everson said he felt that the coverage in this
category was still low compared to his goals, with
only 1 in 63 high-income individuals being
audited.
After several years of decline, audits of small
corporations more than doubled, to almost 18,000.
And audits of corporations with assets of over
$10 million increased 14 percent, to nearly
11,000.
Everson also noted that audit rates were still
below their mid-1990s highs, but had increased
dramatically from just a few years ago.
"We do not have overall audit targets. We have
certain priorities -- high-income individuals and
corporations who might use tax shelters, for
instance," he said. "Our goal is to make sure that
fairness resonates throughout the system. The
average American needs to know that when they pay,
their neighbors and competitors are doing the
same."
The agency also reported that levies and liens
had recovered to levels last seen in 1998, and
that seizures were up slightly from 2004.
The IRS budget for fiscal year 2005 was $10.2
billion, and President Bush has recommended an
increase to $10.7 billion for 2006. |
|
Types of Audits
There are many ways the Internal Revenue Service
determines if an audit is going to occur on your tax
return. Some of them are as follows:
1.
The Differential Income Factor (DIF) Method
Each tax return that is submitted to the Internal
Revenue Service is given a score based on the amount
of income you report and the deductions you claim on
your tax return. If the score your tax return
receives exceeds a particular threshold for your
income, then the Internal Revenue Service could
select your return for audit. For instance, if you
earn approximately $50,000 and you have medical
expenses in excess of $7,000, this would give you a
higher DIF score than someone who has medical
expenses of only $4,000.
Further, if you report home mortgage interest of
approximately $15,000 and your income is $35,000
then your DIF score is higher than someone with the
same income showing only $7,000 in home mortgage
interest. The higher the expenses relative to the
income, the higher the DIF score.
2.
The Information Returns Factor Method
All W-2s and 1099s are submitted to the Internal
Revenue Service every year. Then the Internal
Revenue Service records the social security numbers
from these documents and matches them to the social
security numbers on the tax returns that are
submitted. If you have received a 1099 INT (Interest
Income) showing $1,000 from a bank or credit union
but only report $500 worth of interest income on
your tax return, the Internal Revenue Service will
catch this. They will match the 1099 INT against
your tax return, based on your social security
number, and they will see that you underreported
your interest income by $500. This will select your
tax return for audit.
3.
The Random Selection Method
All tax returns are submitted into a computer
random number generator. The tax returns with the
high DIF scores and non-matched information are
taken out. A certain number of tax returns are
picked at random to make sure the needed four
million tax returns are audited on an annual basis.
These are some of the methods the Internal
Revenue Service uses to determine who is being
audited. Once these tax returns are selected for
audit, they are assigned to Internal Revenue Agents
and Revenue Officers. This is known as assigning
cases or inventory to the auditor.
Top of Page
Find out what the IRS knows
about you
When your tax return is selected for audit, it is
given a certain transaction code (TC). The code
identifies it as being selected for audit. Each of
us who submits tax returns to the Internal Revenue
Service has a record that is kept by the IRS for
many years. These records are known as our
INDIVIDUAL MASTER FILE (IMF).
Since 1974 the Freedom of Information Act has
allowed us to access this IMF. The IMF will give
information on a computer generated report about
each taxpayer the IRS has on record. For instance,
if you have been selected for audit, the IMF will
tell you. It will also tell you if your tax return
has been received by the IRS, if additional taxes
have been assessed, and what the final collection
date is for the tax return and many other codes that
are interrupted from the IMF.
Since cases (inventory) are assigned to agents up
to six months before the taxpayer is even notified
of an audit, a copy of your IMF, can tell you
whether or not your tax return has been selected for
audit.
What to do if you get a notice
from the IRS
If you receive a notice from the IRS, don't
ignore it. You can rest assured that the IRS will
not just go away. All contacts by the IRS should be
handled promptly. Unless you are an accomplished IRS
"fighter," you would be wise to seek professional
assistance from the very first correspondence.
If you are contacted by any government agency
concerning your tax matters, your first call should
be to our firms. Our firm will take care of it so
that you can get on with your business.
IRS Wage
Garnishments
A wage
garnishment stays in effect until the tax is
fully paid or until the IRS agrees to release
the wage garnishment. IRS frequently uses
wage garnishments to collect taxes owed through
your employer. Once a wage garnishment is filed,
the employer is required to collect a percentage
of each paycheck. IRS wage garnishment
requires that a large percentage of
taxpayer's wages be turned over directly to the
IRS.
Below are the
sections from the IRS Internal Revenue Manual
that deal with IRS levies and wage garnishments.
5.11.5.1
(05-05-1998)
Introduction
An individual's
wages, salary, and other income can be levied.
Wages and salary include payment for personal
services in a work relationship.
5.11.5.2
(05-05-1998)
Employer Threatens to Fire Taxpayer Because of a
Levy
-
Sometimes an
employer threatens to fire an employee to
avoid handling a levy. This might be a
violation of 15 USC 1674.
-
If the employer
fires the taxpayer because of this, the
employer might be fined 00. There may also be
a one year prison term.
-
Refer the
taxpayer to the Wage and Hour Division of the
Department of Labor (DOL). DOL, not IRS, must
decide if the employer violated the law.
5.11.5.3
(09-04-1998)
Continuous Effect of Levy
-
Unlike other
levies, a levy on wages and salary has a
continuous effect. It attaches future
paychecks, until the levy is released. Wages
and salary include fees, bonuses, and
commissions. All other levies only attach
property and rights to property that exist
when the levy is served.
Example: If a
bank account is levied, it only reaches money
in the account when the levy is served. It
does not affect money deposited later.
-
When other income
is levied, the levy only reaches money the
taxpayer has a fixed and determinable right
to. Also see 6.1, about retirement and benefit
income.
Example: A levy
is served to take an author's royalties. The
author has a fixed and determinable right to
royalties for books that have already been
published. The levy reaches royalties for
sales of those books in the future. The levy
does not reach royalties for books that are
written and published later. A new levy must
be served to take those royalties.
-
Also, see 6.11.1
when a levy is served on a non-liable spouse
in a community property state.
5.11.5.4
(05-05-1998)
Exempt Amount
-
Part of the
taxpayer's wages, salary, and other income is
exempt from levy.
-
The weekly exempt
amount is:
-
The total of
the taxpayer's standard deduction and the
amount deductible for exemptions on an
income tax return for the year the levy is
served.
-
Then, this
total is divided by 52.
-
Income that is
not paid weekly is prorated, so the same
amount is exempt.
-
In addition, the
amount the taxpayer needs to pay court ordered
child support is exempt. However, the order
must be before the date of the levy.
Note: The support
order can be from a court or administrative
process under the laws and procedures of a
state, territory or possession.
Reminder: If
support is allowed, the same child can not be
claimed as an exemption for figuring the
exempt amount. See (2)a.
- If the
taxpayer has already shown proof of the
required child support payment.
-
Then write,
"Under section 6334(a)(8) of the Internal
Revenue Code, $ ____________________ is
exempt from this levy."
- If the
taxpayer shows proof of the child support
after the levy is served.
-
Then release
enough of the levy, so the support can be
paid.
-
The taxpayer is
not entitled to the support exemption, unless
the support is being paid.
-
Consider
getting the taxpayer to have the payment
withheld and sent directly to the person
with custody.
-
Instead, the
taxpayer may make the payment through the
Service, which will forward the payment.
When there is no open assignment, have the
payments sent through Case Processing
Support. This may happen if the payments are
being monitored in the service center.
5.11.5.4.1
(05-05-1998)
Claiming the Exempt Amount
-
The Notice of
Levy on Wages, Salary, and Other Income
includes a Statement of Exemptions and Filing
Status. The employer gives this to the
taxpayer to complete and return within three
days. If it is not received by then, the
amount is figured as if the person is married
filing separate with one exemption. The
taxpayer can give the statement to the
employer later to change the exempt amount.
Note: The
employer needs to use this Statement rather
than the employee's W-4. Taxpayers may claim
different exemptions for withholding from
those claimed on their return.
-
Publication 1494
is sent with the levy to help figure the
exempt amount.
-
The taxpayer can
give a new statement to the employer later to
have the exempt amount computed again.
Example: The
taxpayer's filing status or personal
exemptions may change.
Example: There
may be a change in exempt rates in a new year.
-
The statement is
completed under penalty of perjury. Generally,
accept the information on the statement,
unless there is reason to question it. If it
is disallowed, notify the employer and the
taxpayer in writing. The taxpayer can show
evidence that the statement is right and ask
for a manager's review.
5.11.5.4.2
(05-05-1998)
Employers with Centralized Payrolls
-
Some employers
have a centralized payroll, so the payroll is
not handled where most employees work.
-
Consider mailing
the statement of exemptions and filing status
directly to the taxpayer. This avoids the
delay of the employer remailing it.
5.11.5.4.3
(05-05-1998)
Joint Liabilities
-
For joint
liabilities, generally, levy the income of the
spouse with the larger income.
-
Levy both incomes
only in flagrant cases of neglect or refusal
to pay. Get manager's approval to do this. If
taxpayers are separated, consider collecting
from the second spouse before allowing the
entire amount to be paid by levy on one
person's income.
- IF the
taxpayers are filing as married filing
jointly & both taxpayers' incomes are levied
-
Then only one
of them can claim the standard deduction for
figuring the exempt amount.
- If the
taxpayers are filing with any other filing
status & both taxpayers' incomes are levied
-
Then both can
claim the standard deductions for their
filing status.
- If the
taxpayers are remarried and filing as
married filing jointly with the new spouses
& both taxpayers' incomes are levied
-
Then both can
claim the standard deductions for their
filing status.
-
When both
spouses' incomes are levied, neither spouse
can claim the other one as a personal
exemption.
5.11.5.4.4
(05-05-1998)
Taxpayers with More Than One Source of Income
-
Consider income
from all sources when a taxpayer has more than
one source.
- If the
taxpayer is getting the exempt amount from
one source of income that is levied &
another source of income is levied, too.
-
Then include
Letter 1697(P) with the second levy to tell
the employer not to allow any exempt amount.
- If the
taxpayer has a source of income that is not
levied & that source of income is at least
as much as the exempt amount.
-
Letter 1697(P)
can be included with a levy on another
source of income to tell the employer not to
allow the exempt amount.
-
See Exhibit
5.11.5-1, for a copy of Letter 1697(P).
5.11.5.4.5
(05-05-1998)
Taxpayer's Payroll Deductions
-
A levy legally
attaches the taxpayer's gross income minus the
exempt amount. However, see Policy P-5-29. By
policy, a levy only attaches the taxpayer's
usual take home pay.
Exception:
Voluntary deductions can be disallowed, if
they are so large they defeat the levy.
-
Generally, allow
the taxpayer to maintain deductions they
already have when the levy is served. Notify
the employer and the taxpayer of deductions
that must stop while the levy is in effect.
The taxpayer can ask for a manager's review of
this.
Example: The
taxpayer has a deduction used to buy shares in
a mutual fund.
-
Generally,
employer's should not allow new voluntary
deductions after receiving the levy.
Exceptions can be allowed on a case by case
basis, with the Service's approval.
Example: The
taxpayer can not join the company insurance
plan, until he is on the job six months. The
levy is served before then. The amount of the
premium is not unreasonable.
-
The method that
the taxpayer is paid is not relevant to take
home pay. Direct deposit is not a payroll
deduction.
5.11.5.4.6
(07-26-2002)
Severance Pay
-
The taxpayer may
leave a job and get severance pay.
- If severance
pay is attributable to pay for a period of
time.
-
Then the exempt
amount is based on that time period.
- If severance
pay is not attributable to pay for a period
of time.
-
Then the amount
exempt for one pay period is used.
Example:
Severance pay is one week's pay for each year
on the job. A taxpayer on the job for ten
years gets ten weeks' severance pay. The
taxpayer gets a paycheck every two weeks for
ten weeks. Two weeks' exempt amount is
subtracted from each check, just like the
person was still working for ten weeks.
Example: The same
facts as above, but the taxpayer gets the
amount in one payment. The payment is
attributable to ten weeks' pay. The employer
is just making an "advance" payment, instead
of writing a series of checks. The taxpayer
gets ten weeks' exempt amount.
Example: A
taxpayer gets a lump sum that is not
attributable to a period of time. This could
be, for example, an incentive payment to
retire early. The exempt amount is based on
the taxpayer's regular pay period. If there is
no regular pay period, use one week's exempt
amount. Similarly, if the taxpayer gets 00 for
each year on the job, this is not attributable
to pay periods. A person getting ,000 for
being on the job ten years does NOT get ten
years' exempt amount.
-
This assumes the
person is not already getting the exempt
amount for a pay period at the same time. If
both are being received, the taxpayer does not
get the exempt amount twice.
Example: The
taxpayer is paid for both the last pay period
worked and severance on the last pay day. The
taxpayer only gets the exempt amount once.
5.11.5.5
(07-26-2002)
Levy Payments
-
Credit levy
payments on the date they are received. Apply
the money in the most advantageous way to the
government. Generally, apply it to the oldest
assessment, first. The taxpayer can not
designate how to apply the money, because this
is not a voluntary payment.
-
Use designated
payment code (DPC) 05 for levy payments. Use
DPC 15 for other payments caused by a levy, if
they are not levy proceeds.
Example: A wage
levy prompts the taxpayer to pay the amount
owed, to get the levy released. Code this
payment with DPC 15.
-
Payments for
these levies may be small. Decide if the
amount owed should be paid from the levy
proceeds. When the payments are small compared
to the amount owed, though, consider other
enforced collection.
- If Payments
are being monitored in CFf & one more
payment is expected to pay off the amount
owed.
-
Then use Form
668-D to give the employer a payoff figure
and release the levy after that is paid.
- If at least
two payments are received & no additional
collection is warranted.
-
Then consider
transferring the case to the service center
for monitoring. Get management approval,
first. See 2.4.9 and 4.3.3.5 of IRM 105.1
Collecting Contact Handbook.
Section 7216 Frequently Asked
Questions
|
| |
|
These Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs) present
introductory information about
revised regulations and a new
revenue procedure for complying
with Internal Revenue Code
Section (IRC §) 7216. It is
intended to alert tax return
preparers and other persons who
work with preparers and
taxpayers that important new
rules and regulations apply to
them and the way they do
business. Readers should not
rely solely on this Q&A to
answer questions. Instead please
refer to the recently revised
Treasury Regulations, Treas.
Reg. §301.7216, and recently
enacted
Revenue Procedure 2008-35
for complete authoritative
information. If you have
other questions, please seek the
advice of counsel.
Q1 What is §7216 and
why is it an issue now?
A1 Internal Revenue
Code §7216 is a criminal
provision enacted by the U.S.
Congress in the 1971 that
prohibits preparers of tax
returns from knowingly or
recklessly disclosing or using
tax return information. A
convicted preparer may be fined
not more than $1,000 or
imprisoned not more than one
year or both, for each
violation. The Secretary
of Treasury is permitted to
grant exceptions to this general
prohibition by issuing
regulations. Treas. Reg.
§301.7216 had been
substantially unchanged for over
30 years and did not address the
modern return preparation
marketplace, particularly
electronic filing and the
cross-marketing of financial and
commercial products and services
during the return preparation
experience. After a long
process that included many
public suggestions and comments,
updated regulations were
published on
January 7 and
July 2, 2008 and apply to
uses and disclosures beginning
on January 1, 2009.
Q2 How are civil
penalties applicable to the
disclosure of tax return
information?
A2 Internal
Revenue Code §6713 imposes a
civil penalty of $250 on any
person who is engaged in the
business of preparing, or
providing services in connection
with the preparation of returns
of tax, or any person who for
compensation prepares a return
for another person, and who
-
Discloses any
information furnished to
him for, or in
connection with, the
preparation of any such
return, or
-
Uses any such
information for any
purpose other than to
prepare, or assist in
preparing, any such
return. Imposition of
the penalty under
Internal Revenue Code
§6713 does not require
that the disclosure be
knowing or reckless as
it does under Internal
Revenue Code §7216.
Q3 What is a “tax
return preparer?”
A3 Tax
return preparers are persons
that participate in the
preparation of tax returns for
taxpayers, including but not
limited to:
-
Return preparers that
are in business or hold
themselves out as
preparers*
-
Casual preparers that
are compensated
-
Electronic return
originators**
-
Electronic return
transmitters**
-
Intermediate Service
Providers**
-
Software Developers**
-
Reporting Agents**
The definition also extends
to those that assist others in
preparing returns or performing
auxiliary services in connection
with preparing returns, or are
employed by preparers and
perform auxiliary services in
connection with the preparation
of tax returns.
NOTE: *
This includes volunteer
preparers that participate in
programs like VITA
and TCE. ** These persons are
part of the electronic filing
arena and are collectively
known as e-file providers (see
also
Revenue Procedure 2007-40).
Q4 Have the new
regulations changed the
definition of tax return
preparer?
A4 The new
regulations clarify that e-file
providers are considered tax
return preparers and persons
that perform auxiliary services
for e-file providers in
connection with tax return
preparation are covered by the
statute and regulations.
The regulations also clarify
that contractors receiving tax
return information (See 5 below)
from tax return preparers are
considered tax return preparers
subject to the same provisions
and penalties. Tax
return preparers that engage
contractors and disclose tax
return information to them are
required to inform contractors
of the rules and consequences in
a written notice. (See
also questions 12-17 below).
Q5 What is “tax
return information?”
A5
Tax return information is all
the information tax return
preparers obtain from taxpayers
or other sources in any form or
manner that is used to prepare
tax returns or is obtained in
connection with the preparation
of returns. It also
includes all computations,
worksheets, and printouts
preparers create; correspondence
from IRS during the preparation,
filing and correction of
returns; statistical
compilations of tax return
information; and tax return
preparation software
registration information. All
tax return information is
protected by §7216 and the
regulations.
Q6 What are
“disclosures” of tax return
information?
A6
Disclosure of tax return
information is the act of making
tax return information known to
any person in any manner
whatsoever. The
regulations authorize two types
of disclosures:
The regulations provide
exceptions allowing tax return
preparers to disclose tax return
information without a taxpayer’s
prior written consent under
certain circumstances: e.g.,
disclosures to the IRS, other
taxing jurisdictions or the
courts; disclosures to other
U.S.-based tax return preparers
that assist in preparing the
return; and disclosures for the
purpose of obtaining legal
advice. These and other
exceptions can be found in
Treas. Reg. §301.7216-2.
All other disclosures not
specifically authorized require
tax return preparers to secure
from taxpayers advance signed
consents (see 7 below)
authorizing the disclosures.
Q7 What are “consents
to disclose tax return
information?”
A7 Consents to
disclose tax return information
are paper or electronic
documents that contain certain
specific information including
the names of the tax return
preparer and the taxpayer and
that specify the nature of the
disclosure(s), to whom the
disclosures will be made, and
details on the data to be
disclosed. Consents are
valid only if they are a made by
the taxpayer knowingly and
voluntarily and are signed and
dated by the taxpayer in
pen-and-ink or electronically.
Consent forms must include
certain language and warnings.
Refer to Treas. Reg.
§301.7216-3(a)(3) and Revenue
Procedure 2008-35 for complete
information.
Q8 When and how does
a tax return preparer obtain
consent to disclose tax return
information?
A8 Tax return
preparers must obtain consent to
disclose tax return information
before returns are provided to
the taxpayer for signature and
before tax return information is
disclosed. The rules for
obtaining consents are found in
Treas. Reg. 301.7216-3 and
Revenue Procedure 2008-35.
Q9 What are “uses” of
tax return information?
A9 Uses
of tax return information are
occurrences where tax return
preparers refer to, or rely on,
tax return information as the
basis to take or permit actions.
The regulations authorize two
types of uses:
The regulations authorize tax
return preparers to use
specified tax return information
without a taxpayer’s prior
written consent under certain
circumstances: e.g., to create
lists for solicitation of tax
return business; to produce
statistical information in
connection with tax return
preparation business.
These and other exceptions can
be found in Treas. Reg.
§301.7216-2.
All other uses not
specifically authorized require
tax return preparers to secure
from taxpayers advance signed
consents (see 10 below)
authorizing the uses.
Q10 What are
“consents to use tax return
information?”
A10 Consents
to use tax return information
are paper or electronic
documents that contain certain
specific information including
the names of the tax return
preparer and the taxpayer and
that describe the particular use
authorized, identify the product
or service for which the tax
return information will be used,
and detail the data to be used.
Consents are valid only if they
are made by the taxpayer
knowingly and voluntarily and
are signed and dated by the
taxpayer in pen-and-ink or
electronically. Consent
forms must include certain
language and warnings.
Refer to Treas. Reg.
§301.7216-3(a)(3) and Revenue
Procedure 2008-35 for complete
information.
Q11 When and how does
a tax return preparer obtain
consent to use tax return
information?
A11 Tax return
preparers must obtain consent to
use tax return information
before tax return information is
used and before returns are
provided to the taxpayer for
signature. The rules for
obtaining consents are found in
Treas. Reg. §301.7216-3(b) and
Revenue Procedure 2008-35.
Q12 Do consents to
disclose or use tax return
information have expiration
dates?
A12 Yes. The
taxpayer and tax return preparer
may agree to specify the period
of time the consent will be
effective and include the period
in the consent form. If no
period is specified the
regulations state that the
consent will be effective for a
period of one year from the date
the taxpayer signed the consent.
Q13 Have the rules
changed for obtaining consents
to disclose or use tax return
information?
A13
Yes. The basic rules are still
provided by Treas. Reg.
§301.7216-3, while additional
rules can be found in Revenue
Procedure 2008-35. These rules
include the following notable
changes:
-
Multiple consents to
disclose are permitted
on one consent form
-
Multiple consents to use
are permitted on one
consent form
-
Consent form format
requirements have
changed
-
Certain prescribed
language and warnings
are now required
-
Electronic consent forms
are expressly permitted
-
Electronic signatures on
consent forms are
expressly permitted
-
Disclosure of social
security numbers outside
the U.S. must satisfy
special requirements.
Refer to Treas. Reg.
§301.7216-3 and Revenue
Procedure 2008-35 for other
changes and complete
information.
Q14 What are the
special rules for disclosing tax
return information outside the
United States?
A14 Disclosing
tax return information to
another tax return preparer that
is assisting in the preparation
of the return or providing
auxiliary services in connection
with preparing the return
generally does not require the
consent of the taxpayer.
However, if the other tax return
preparer is located outside the
United States or any territory
or possession of the United
States, the taxpayer must agree
and sign a form consenting to
the disclosure. See
Revenue Procedure 2008-35,
section 4.04(1)(e) for specific
language that must be included
in the consent form. If
the tax return information to be
disclosed includes social
security numbers, (See Q3).
Q15 What are the
special rules for disclosing
social security numbers outside
the United States?
A15 Generally,
tax return preparers may not
obtain consents to disclose
social security numbers to tax
return preparers located outside
the United States or any
territory or possession of the
United States. If social
security numbers are included in
documents for which the tax
return preparer has obtained the
consent of the taxpayer to
disclose the tax return preparer
must redact or mask any social
security number before
disclosing the tax return
information to a return preparer
outside the United States.
There is an exception.
Social security numbers may be
disclosed to tax return
preparers located outside the
United States if taxpayer
consent is obtained and both the
sending and receiving tax return
preparers maintain adequate data
protection safeguards defined in
Revenue Procedure 2008-35,
section 4.07. See also
Revenue Procedure 2008-35,
section 4.04(1)(e)(ii) for
specific language that must be
included in the consent form.
Q16 Are the staffs of
banks and credit unions that
receive copies of tax returns in
connection with applications for
mortgages included within the
definition of tax return
preparers?
A16 No.
They are ordinarily not covered
because they ordinarily are not
preparing a taxpayer’s return,
providing auxiliary services in
connection with the preparation
of tax returns, being
compensated for preparing tax
returns, or employed by a tax
return preparer.
Q17 Are the people who
prepare Medicaid applications
deemed subject to the
regulations because they use tax
return data in preparing
Medicaid applications?
A17 No.
(See A16).
Q18 Are the members of co-op
boards of directors subject to
the regulations because they
require a tax return in the
package of documents that must
be included when seeking
approval to purchase a co-op?
A18 No.
(See A16).
Q19 Is a fee-based financial
planner subject to the
regulations because they review
copies of tax return in order to
create a financial plan?
A19 No.
(See A16).
Q20 Are financial aid advisors
included because they utilize
tax return data?
A20 No.
(See A16).
|
|
|
Page Last Reviewed or
Updated: November 07, 2008
|
|
California,
La Jolla, San Diego.
|